Past month, I did several of my Firsts. It was the result of a conscious
effort to go outside my usual genres and try something different. And thus I have
seen movies from 3 directors I have never seen any movie of, who have always made bizarre movies and probably
are few of the most controversial directors in Hollywood:
1. David Lynch - Blue Velvet(1986). Though have seen The Elephant Man(1980) before, I don't remember it.
2. David Cronenberg - The Fly(1985). I have already written about it
in the last post about 80s movies.
3. Lars Von Trier - Melancholia(2011). Which brings us here to
another of my firsts. This Post.
I am sure that all of us are aware of the film since it's screening in Cannes
earlier this year and controversy Von Trier created their with his statements.
Personally, it almost felt like he was missing that controversial atmosphere
which usually surrounds his movies and hence he just created one on his own.
Not a point here though. So, I am sure that by now everyone at least knows
about what the movie is about. Melancholia(2011) is a story of two sisters, Justina and Claire, who can not be more
different from each other. In first half, It tells the story of Justine's
Wedding Night from her perspective and in second part it tells the story of the
day when planet Melancholia is expected to hit earth, this time from Claire's
Perspective. I have been waiting to see this one since I first saw the trailer.
Idea looked really promising and it was said to be von Trier's most accessible film.
And then Kirsten Dunst went on to win the Best Actress Prize at Cannes as well
and upon its release, mostly garnered positive responses. So, probably a good
place to start for him. Since I haven't seen any of his previous work, I can
not compare it with anything. But, on its own, it does stand pretty solidly.
Movie starts off with extended slow motion sequence where we see some of
the characters in the film experiencing a planet, we later learn is named
Melancholia, colliding with earth and its various effects on earth like birds
dropping dead, roots coming out of ground. This sequence is shot beautifully
and has a very good potential to unnerve you. This probably will remind you of
the creation sequence of The Tree of Life(2011) though these are two
polarizing events. Though it is a visual treat, at this point I wasn't sure
what was I watching. It all comes through by the end. After that we see
Justine's Wedding Reception. Justine is clinically depressed and though her
sister has arranged an extravagant reception for her, she just needs a small
nudge to go back to the dungeons of her depression. Her divorced parents and
overly persuasive boss keep pushing her until she alienates herself from
everyone. It all starts happily, looking like a congregation of family and
friends enjoying the most important day in her life. However, slowly it becomes
very clear that she is losing it.
Second Half, much more intriguing in my opinion, starts with Claire
bringing severely depressed Justine to her Castle. Claire has a normal life,
rich husband and almost looks like the exact opposite of Justine. Justine is so
depressed that she is even unable to do mundane things like taking a bath.
However, Melancholia is approaching. Claire is convinced that is going to
collide even though her husband, an astronomy enthusiast, tries to convince her
otherwise and this scares her to her wits. The reason I appreciated second half
more than first is it gives much more depth to one dimensional characters up to
now. In the hours of impending doom, Claire who has been the rock of her
family in any event, starts to loose it. Justine however, who is just recovering
from her own depression, handles it much bravely. Thus proving Von Trier's
theory that depressed person can handle the apocalyptic event much better than
normal person. Even Claire's Husband John, who comes as a snob in first half,
looks like a genuine family man who cares about his family - just can not stand
his in-laws. It was pretty easy to hate many of these characters after first
half. Second half reminds us that they also are human. It also has my favorite line in the movie, a thought I haven't been able to get out of my head since watching. Justine says "The Earth is evil. We don't need to grieve for earth. Nobody will miss it". More I think about it, it haunts me more.
Main Reason for this film to work is some stellar performances by Kirsten
Dunst(Justin), Charlotte Gainsbourg(Claire) and most of the supporting cast.
Kirsten Dunst is the pick of them all. She is the perfect embodiment of
depression. One second she looks like she is enjoying the festivities around
her, making a conscious effort to fight it and very next frame, she is engulfed
in it. She also brings a lot of credibility to her act in second act showing
real calmness in the apocalyptic event. Charlotte Gainsbourg is equally
impressive and so is support cast of Kiefer Sutherland (Clair's Husband), Charlotte Rampling(Their Mom),
Stellan Skarsgaard(Justine's Boss) and John Hurt(Their Father). It also looks amazing thanks to amazing
cinematography throughout the film. Come Award season, it should give The Tree of Life(2011) run for his money in this department. I also like the
fact that Von Tries decided to focus much more on psychological effects on a
single family than showing it as a mass murdering event. Because of it, it
becomes much more realistic and I did not care much about any possible scientific
flaws in the film. On the negative side, it moves quite slowly and is
depressing almost the whole time. It might even be little stretched in few
parts. However, this is no reason to miss such a wonderfully made movie. And
Wait till the End !!
Very interesting movie, it splitted me in two, but I can still appreciate it! The end was powerful!Great review!
ReplyDeleteVery Interesting. And yes end definitely was spectacular. Thanks for stopping by.
ReplyDelete