First and foremost, what makes this a Blind
Spot movie? In other words, why is this film essential?
Frankenstein is an ideal example of man crossing his boundaries to be someone he doesn’t fully grasp and obviously to most dire results. Henry Frankenstein is obsessed with being God and his desire to create life is what brings this calamity on him as well as others. Over the years, we have had fair share of movies warning us about it but this could be one of the pioneers. Also, It must have taken some guts to take such an acclaimed piece of literature and put his own spin on that, hopefully without loosing the gist of original. James Whale not only dared to do that but did it well and the fact that it holds so well after so many years and is still so true is a real testament to its timelessness.
I don’t think it
needs any other reason than because it is Frankenstein. The reason I chose Frankenstein(1931)
is, believe it or not but, I had never known this story up until recently despite being a lauded literary classic. Extent of my knowledge went so far as knowing a scientist creates some monster. That's it! For the longest time, I was under the impression that name of the monster is Frankenstein because, frankly, that does sound rather sinister name. So I thought this might be a good
chance not just to check out one of the most iconic horror films in movie
history but also to get acquainted to this piece of classic literature. And off
course, there can’t be a more apt time of the year than Halloween for this,
right?
So, what is the story about?
Henry
Frankenstein is a young scientist obsessed with being a God. He wants to create
life and has spent months in isolation working on his machine he believes will create
life. We first meet him in a graveyard, along with his deformed assistant
Frits, making rounds of cremation grounds and gallows looking for human parts
to assemble complete human body to revive. Back home, his fiancée Elizabeth is
worried about him and seeks help of his former teacher and mentor Dr. Waldman.
Along with Victor Moritz, friend of both Henry and Elizabeth, they go to his
laboratory to put some sense into him. There they witness Henry bring a monstrous,
grotesque body he has composed form various stolen parts back to life. Initially
Henry is extremely happy with the results but soon, because of series of
misunderstandings, his monster turns on them. Henry realizes his mistake and
even agrees to destroy his own creation but he underestimates the monster he
has brought to life and wrecks havoc.
I am pretty sure
everyone knows the story in general because I don’t think there are many more
specimen like me out there. Not only have I never read Mary Shelley’s book, I
had no idea what the story was until I saw this couple of nights ago. Since
then I did a little research about the book and it seems that movie took a lot
of freedom in interpreting the story in its own way. It not only prunes various
characters and storylines but also makes it much lighter in terms of price Dr.
Frankenstein has to pay for his creation. It even adds few things here and
there. I would not know if it is for better or for worse until I read the book
but I did like what I saw.
It satisfied me
on various levels. First of all being a 1931 movie, I immediately assumed it to
be a silent film. Imagine my surprise as the master of ceremony takes the stage
to warn us about the horrors coming our way and he actually talks. Then there
is also the matter of this unprecedented introduction. Agreed that I haven’t
seen most of Frankenstein’s brother classic monster movies but I have
never heard of such introduction before and it definitely got me right into the
mood for a horror movie. Score!
Once again, being
a 1931 movie, when you sit yourself down to watch it you have certain
expectations from it. You expect to see a lot of stagey, loud emoting. Much
more emphasis is on actually showing every strand of emotion than just hinting
at it. I don’t mean to downplay that because it’s something you have to leave
with in movies from that period. I have become used to it by now and, as I just
said, even accept it as a trademark of the period. While this movie does have
its share of such moments, frequency of it and scale is on much lower side. It
makes it much easier to get into this movie. I was pleasantly surprised by how
much modern it looked in its presentation.
Last and certainly
most important thing is Boris Karloff and his monster. Though it is considered
an iconic horror film, it can hardly be scary after more than 80 years. We have
seen far too much now to be scared of it. But mere presence of Karloff with
that equally iconic makeup is still quite enough to send some shivers down your
spine. However what makes this performance worth mentioning here is this isn’t
just one-dimensional monster. Even if we look at that one encounter with Maria,
it manages to make him look somewhat human in his own way with that. It ends
with disastrous results for both Maria and the monster but showing him being
able to connect is definitely worth praise.
After having seen it, do I agree with its
'essential' status? And why?
Not only because
this is one of the most iconic horror movies but also because of the various motifs
it manages to touch upon I think this classic story, which has managed to stay
in the discussion for well over a century, certainly deserves the label
essential. From very early stage of our existence, our desire, our need to push
our own boundaries, explore new grounds has brought us where we are. However right
now, when our lives are more than ever governed by the technology, is the need
for us to know where to stop. With the monster’s encounter with Maria that I
alluded to earlier, it also brings forth the question of whether it was our
incompetence in understanding him, nurturing him into our own civilization is
what brings out his monstrosities; another warning against conquering the
unknowns.
Frankenstein is an ideal example of man crossing his boundaries to be someone he doesn’t fully grasp and obviously to most dire results. Henry Frankenstein is obsessed with being God and his desire to create life is what brings this calamity on him as well as others. Over the years, we have had fair share of movies warning us about it but this could be one of the pioneers. Also, It must have taken some guts to take such an acclaimed piece of literature and put his own spin on that, hopefully without loosing the gist of original. James Whale not only dared to do that but did it well and the fact that it holds so well after so many years and is still so true is a real testament to its timelessness.
Does it open few new doors for me? Does
this inspire to watch any other movies?
I have only seen The Phantom of the Opera(1925) and Nosferatu(1922) of all the classic
monster horror movies I alluded to earlier. If these three films are any
indication, I will like to try my hand at some more of that genre. Maybe The Mummy(1932) for more Boris Karloff or Dracula(1931), another equally
iconic movie with equally iconic monster Bela Lugosi as well a classic piece of
literature and maybe even The Wolf Man(1941). Being black and white
horror movies, I don’t know when will I really get to them but I certainly
would like to try some of them. Hopefully soon, at least before next Halloween.
Frankenstein was part of my introduction to early horror too. I had seen things like Nosferatu (love it) and The Cabinet of Dr Caligari, but it was only when we watched Frankenstein in class that I became more aware of that trend of the time.
ReplyDeleteI recently watched a lot of black and white horror movies from the Universal Monsters series in relation to an upcoming Lambcast, so I can recommend The Mummy (Boris Karloff is great). The Wolf Man is interesting, especially effect-wise, but a bit bland in my opinion. My favorites are Bride of Frankenstein, which I actually think is better than the first, because it goes more into depth with the psychological aspect of the monster, and Dracula, which is hilarious, well-shot and super entertaining. Hope that helped you!
Thanks for the recommendations! Looks like I have some work to do. I will also add Bride of Frankenstein to the list as well.
DeleteTo think Frankenstein is the monster is a common mistake, that I myself made for a long time! People even say "You look like Frankenstein".
ReplyDeleteI'm really excited to watch Dracula, since I find Bela Lugosi extremely interesting, but I'm reading the book first. Somehow, in my mind, Dracula and Frankenstein go together, so I'm watching them like that. Oh I've been dying to see Frankenstein since I saw... Arsenic and Old Lace! I'm waiting for everything, it's like delayed pleasure, haha.
Well, that is true. At least I am not alone in doing that. :)
DeleteYou know the funny thing is I wanted to read Dracula as well but surprisingly, my university in US did not have a copy of it and I was lazy to order it from outside and didn't try much since. But I will watch the movie now. As for Frankenstein, hope you will like it as and when you get to it.
Very nice review! I haven't seen Frankenstein in several years but it was a favorite of mine growing up. Definitely an essential to horror fans and movie lovers.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Now that I have seen it, I definitely agree.
DeleteI really need to see this as well - when I was in high school, we studied Frankenstein in my final year, so I've read the book back to front and think it's brilliant, but the only film we watched of it was the Kenneth Branagh film (...ahh, not one of his best works) To say it departed from the book wildly in places would be an understatement.
ReplyDeleteI've only seen Nosferatu as well! I've seen Faust (1926) which I loved, but I don't think you'd count it as classic horror...
I have seen Faust as well but yeah, I don't think that one is in the same canon as this.
DeleteAs far as I know, even this one is changed significantly from the book but it seems to be the consensus that it handles it well. I guess, it will be an interesting experience for you. Would love to see your take on it.
I'm still relatively unfamiliar with early horror films. For instance, I haven't seen any of the films you mention in the final paragraph. I do love Frankenstein, though, and I'll second Mette's recommendation of The Bride of Frankenstein, which I prefer to the first film.
ReplyDeleteJoin the Gang !! :D
Deletei HAVE to see Bride of Frankenstein now. However, I just listened to the Lambcast episode Mette mentioned and almost everyone else Hated it there. But I will get to it.