One of the biggest events of the year when it comes
to movies, Cannes Film Festival, started on 15th May. Even though
Sidney Lumet disregards it as ‘nothing but glorified sales convention’ in his
book, for many of us it is still a big deal. At least we get an idea of what to
expect from many films that we are waiting eagerly for. During the time of the
festival, Criterion made a bunch of their films that made splash in Cannes in
the past, free for streaming on Hulu. Having many of them on my watch list for
some time, I decided to make maximum of this opportunity and here we are, with
the ‘Palme d’Or Winners’ edition of ‘1001 Movies’ mini reviews.
Z(1969): Politics and History are the two things that have
always fascinated me. Costa-Gavras’ political drama Z, based on a book
by Vasilis Vasilikos, brings these two topics together and hence has been on my
watch-list for quite some time. It is very difficult to sum up Z in few
sentences without giving up too much about it. Or it is difficult to sum it up
in few sentences that will sound as fascinating as movie is. I probably can
round it in single sentence – it is a story of murder and subsequent trial of a
leader of left-wing party in the right-wing military led country. If you don’t
have problem with watching politically motivated movies and that doesn’t entice
you, you’ll have to take my word that every second of it was in fact
intriguing. Also, what happens is probably less important than how and why? Story
has many layers to it and works on multiple fronts that, as a viewer, you have
to keep track of. At the same time, there are so many characters we are
introduced to and so many events that happen at a very brisk pace. But, not
having read the book I do not know if it the story or screenplay that I should
credit, it is told in such a way that it never gets confusing. All the events
line-up perfectly, all the characters get enough time to leave their impression.
Another interesting thing about it was the way it
changes the protagonist in the middle of it. At the start whole focus is in Z,
this charismatic leader played by Yves Montand, and various problems their
organisation faces arranging the event he is in the town for, the death threat
he receives and eventually the attack on him which results in his death. Enter
Jean-Louise Trintignant, playing a magistrate specially brought in to
investigate this case and from that point onwards, whole focus shifts on him. I
am not sure if I have seen this anywhere else. Film carefully tries to avoid
any reference to any particular country or place. We never get the name of any
country or city everything is happening. Someone more familiar with Greece may
deduce it based on the names mentioned or judiciary and military system in
work, if that is a good indicator. I can’t. But if you know certain facts about
this movie and the events it portrays, you can certainly see so many hidden
clues pointing to the obvious. The events depicted in this movie are based upon
the assassination of democratic Greek politician Grigoris Lambrakis in 1963. Everything
about Lambrakis’ background, events that led to this attack, the manner in
which it was carried out and the aftermath of this event matches with what we
see. Also the fact that Z means 'He Lives' in ancient Greek also points towards Greece. However despite being inflammatory, everything is portrayed with remarkable candour. If you can stand
127 minutes worth of political cat-and-mouse chase, this movie is must for you.
Rating(out
of 5):
Taste of Cherry(1997): When I saw Certified Copy(2010), that was the first time I heard of Abbas Kiarostami. Since then
I’ve seen his name constantly making rounds through various sources though I
never saw any of the movies he did apart from that. Even though I wasn’t the
biggest fan of Certified Copy, there were quite a few of his films that
interested me. But I never got around to any of them until this weekend when I
saw that criterion had Taste of Cherry streaming for free on Hulu, being
previous Palme d’Or winner. This was a curious film. In fact, all the three
films I saw for this post were curious. Taste of Cherry is about a
middle-aged man, Mr. Badii, who has determined that there is nothing in his
life worth leaving for and therefore wishes to die. He has already decided how
he wants to kill himself; he has even picked up a spot for his own grave. All
he needs is someone to bury him after he is dead. In his truck, he drives
around the various parts of city in search of someone who is alone so that he
won’t go on telling anyone and is willing to help him. This is pretty much what
the whole movie is about and majority of it, almost 90%, takes place while he
is driving in his truck.
Until last 5 minutes of the film, it doesn’t use
any kind of background music. All the sounds we here are natural sounds coming
from various things in the surrounding. It can be birds, people talking around
or machines running in the vicinity but they are all actual sounds direct from
the source. I have only seen a couple of other Iranian films but I’ve noticed
the similar trait in them as well which gives it a very different, curious
feel. In this case, this complete lack of music helps add to his desperation,
his loneliness, his lack of any interest in anything. Desolate landscapes of
cement factory only add to this void. It is interesting to realise that as the
old man tries to get him to live with his tale of cherries, talking about all
the pure, beautiful things in this world worth leaving for, background changes
from barren desert to trees and bustling city alleys probably suggesting there
is still a faint hope he might change his heart. I have never seen Homayoun
Ershadi, playing the lead role of Mr. Badii, in anything else but like Michael
Shannon in Take Shelter(2011), he has a natural look on his face that
goes long way in convincing us of his problems. I don’t know if all the actors
from this movie are trained actors or not but in any case, there is something
in their natural disposition that adds a lot to the overall mood of this movie.
And then there is that ending; but to tell you the truth it was such a
fascinating journey, I was perfectly content with not knowing. I was rather
happy to leave it open-ended.
Rating(out
of 5):
Paris, Texas(1984): For some reason I was under
the impression that this is a time-travel movie. Imagine my disappointment when
it turned out it wasn’t. I swear I was devastated. Paris, Texas is a
very personal story of Travis, a lost man who walked out on his wife and son
four years ago. When he first see him, he is somewhere in the middle on Mohave
Desert in Texas. He runs out of water and so he goes into a bar nearby. As it
turns out, that bar is closed down for some time and he soon collapses out of
exhaustion in that bar. When he wakes up, he is in the hospital and doctor informs
him that he has already called his brother to let him know about Travis. His
brother, Walt, owns a billboard business in L.A. and he, even though surprised
to know Travis’ whereabouts after four years, rushes as soon as he can to reach
this middle of nowhere. By the time he reaches there, Travis has taken off
again but he soon finds him somewhere off the road and they start their journey
back home. Travis has stopped talking; he doesn’t eat or sleep at night. Walt
tries to break his defenses off one by one and by the time they got back home,
he is pretty much back to his old self. With his footing back and Walt and
Anne’s, his wife, encouragement, he starts working on getting his life back together
that he left four years ago.
Like Taste of Cherry, Paris, Texas is a movie in no hurry to reach
anywhere though it does not mean it is an uneventful journey. Couple of times,
I even doubted if it meant to go somewhere because I had no idea where can it
lead to from that point for a while but Wenders directs this ship masterfully. In
many ways, slow pace of this movie allows everything to make its full impact.
It allows you to settle down, process everything you see on screen and form
your own notions. It allows you to be the part of their world, understand all
the characters. Visual beauty of this film also aids us, the viewers, to enter
this world. However what impressed me the most is not the visual beauty. It is
such a beautiful film, not just in its look but also in its tone, in its feel. There
are many very personal but beatific moments in the film like Travis and his son Hunter
looking at the old photographs or whole family watching an old super-8 film of
the family trip they took before Travis disappeared. However, nothing is as beautiful and sad, as deeply moving as
the final conversation between Jane and Travis. It’s his catharsis, his moment
to repent for the life he has given to Jane and Hunter. If that doesn’t
move you, you might even be made of stone.
Rating(out
of 5):
I just saw Z as part of my marathon. Such a great film. I also recommend Taste of Cherry and Paris, Texas, the latter of which is still my favorite Palme d'Or winner and my favorite Wim Wenders films.
ReplyDeleteI don't think I have seen anything else Wenders did except Pina but even though I loved all three films, Paris, Texas is easily my favourite of the three. Loved it!
DeleteThanks for the Comment!
Glad you liked Z, that's one of my all time favorite political films. I can't believe Costa-Gavras was able to get that one made. Love the melancholy of Paris, Texas as well.
ReplyDeleteLove Z! As for Paris, Texas - it might be weird but despite all the melancholy, as you said, I was very content, serene by the end. :)
DeleteWell done man. I'm also glad you loved Z. I should've taken the initiative and watched some of those picks as well. I still haven't seen Paris, Texas or Taste of Cherry, but they're on my watchlist.
ReplyDeleteThanks! Check out Paris, Texas Josh. Highly recommended by me.
Delete