Showing posts with label 4 Stars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 4 Stars. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Catching up with 2013 Mini Reviews: Part II

Gravity(2013): I know I am very late to the party. First of all, it got here couple of weeks late and then I saw it almost a month after it did. Only thing is, I am really glad that I got to see it on the biggest possible screen because it is totally worth it. Alfoanso Cuaron’s latest is one of the best visual masterpieces I have seen and Emmanuel Lubezki deserves every credit for it. I am not a big fan of 3D but after Hugo(2011), this is first film that made me think that it can be used to good effect.

Set in space, Dr. Ryan Stone, on her first ever space mission, and Matt Kowalski, on his last, are on a small mission to service Hubble. However things soon go south as debris from Russian missile strike causes a chain reaction and puts everything in danger. Hands down favourite thing about this film is the kind of atmosphere Cuaron creates around us. With the help of amazing camera movements assisted by some quality editing, Cuaron manages to get viewers into the head of Dr. Stone, sometimes literally, sometimes figuratively, to give them a first hand experience that makes everything so much more better. One of the predominant reactions after watching this was this is closest a normal person will get to being in space and it has a lot of truth to it. One of the frontrunners in this year's best actress race Sandra Bullock, who spends most of this movie alone, also has done a great job in this role. These days it's rare we have a movie that revolves around a female character, which incidentally all three movies in this post do, but it is even rarer to see a movie treat it's female character the way Gravity does. Bullock had a great chance to prove her mettle with this role and she takes it with both hands.

Since I was one of the last 5 people on earth to watch this film, I'd heard lot about it before going in. As much as I was aware of its technological achievements and acclaim it was getting, I also knew it was being criticized for script problems. I never got into specifics of it but I certainly was aware of them and while watching it, I realized why they are important. I am not going to flack it for portraying Russians as villains here or space Jetpacks being retired 30 years earlier. Neither was I too concerned about it getting the names of space shuttles wrong nor did I think Bullock in her shorts sexist. None of these are major plot points that dampen the whole experience but there are some valid points which do affect it. I guess everyone knows what major plot point I am talking about. I am also not sure what I think about unlikelihood of three space ships being in such close proximity at such an attainable altitude. More I think about it, more I have problems with it. I know that it will still be one of my 10-15 favourite films of the year but I will always have a lingering feeling that it could have been better.

Rating(out of 5):


The Bling Ring(2013): I have a very non-typical reaction to Sofia Coppola. I have seen them all except Marie Antoinette(2006) and I haven't disliked any of them but I don't react to them as strongly as many others seem to. There are many aspects of it that I like - stylistic look of it, loneliness it portrays but I guess it doesn't resonate as strongly with me. Even in case of Lost in Translation(2003), which would probably be her highest regarded film, I am much colder to it than everyone else though it certainly is overdue for a rewatch. I am saying all this because it's interesting that despite this history, my reaction to her latest which received much less critical reception than usual is much stronger than the consensus. So much so that even though I will rate both Gravity and The Bling Ring at the same level in stars, I think I like it even more than the former. Yup, I said it! And it is not a dig against Gravity, I just like this one more.

Since its premier in Cannes earlier this year, The Bling Ring is getting a mixed response. For those unaware, it is based on a real story about a group of teenagers in Hollywood who would break into houses of various celebrities and steal from their houses for fun. First of all, it looks fabulous. It has always been Coppola’s strong suit but their clothes, houses – even the ones they break into, lingo they use, locations are done meticulously. It is shot beautifully; background music is used very well. I think it does a great job of poking fun at the current celebrity culture. It really shows the frivolousness of all the characters involved in those robberies for no reason than materialist values in it. There are so many reality shown these days on any network that indulge in exactly this kind of behaviour which Coppola is making fun of in this movie. It is like a satire on that lifestyle. She shows the glamour and glitz of their lifestyle but without making them glamorous. The ending is yet again little jarring but that might my non-typical reaction to her movies.

One problem many people have with it is it lacks any depth. I don’t know how do you make these characters, whose first concern after being caught breaking into Lindsay Lohan’s house was “What did she say about us?” or “Is this long enough to appear conservative?” before appearing in court, look more deep, more real? I doubt if they know the meaning of being one. In their own way, in their own world, they are being as real as they can. At the end, after being caught, Nikki even tries to look more responsible, to look less disconnected to the rest of the world. But we all know it is a sham and Coppola treats it like one. I don't think I would've liked it any other way.

Rating(out of 5):



Frances Ha(2013): Bless Greta Gerwig in all her awkward glory! I think this one sentence is more than enough to express everything I want to about this film. I had been hearing a lot about this movie and especially about her for quite a while now. I won't say I was too excited for it because, despite all the acclaim, it still looked like a chick-flick. I had my expectations in check but it delivered what it promised and some more. The best thing about this film is, even though I actually laughed a couple of times - sometimes with her and sometimes at her, I had a faint smile on my face for all 86 minutes of it. There aren't many movies that have managed to do that! I have a hunch that glorious Black and White played some part in that too.

Frances Ha is a story of Francis Halladay, 27 year old woman leaving in New York who is unsure about everything in her life. She is not sure if she wants to have cats with her boyfriend or move in with him or if she wants to be a dancer or choreographer where she is an apprentice currently. She is not even sure if she doesn't want to any of these things. At one point, she asks her teacher at the academy if she can take some more classes, any more responsibility and after being rejected admits she is proud of herself just for asking. So she is not particularly interested in achieving something or reaching somewhere in her life, she is perfectly content with just trying for it. She's like what one character says about her - she is much older but less grown-up. And despite all this, and we have to give credit to writers for this, she is neither annoying nor pitiable. She is actually very sweet and charming; awkward, little weird and sometimes embarrassing but endearingly so.

Maybe she should think seriously about her future, maybe she should have been somewhere in her life already but she is not and she knows it. Thing with Frances is she lives in the moment. She does what she thinks like doing like going to Paris for a couple of days while being broke. This is probably the stupidest thing you can do but somehow Baumbach and Gerwig even manage to make that endearing. Maybe because we all want to do exactly that; we just don't do it because we are supposed to be more responsible, more grown-up. Not Frances! and its liberating in some way to see at least someone else can do that. Knowing what I did before watching this film, I was almost certain that I will hate her for being plain immature and behaving as if she has some existential crisis. But I did not, even for one minute. Her sudden transformation in the end might be too sudden but I was happy to see her get there, to see her mature through all these experiences and get somewhere at the end of them to be Frances Ha. That was a deft touch by the way!

Rating(out of 5):

Sunday, October 20, 2013

October Horror: Mini Reviews

As is the convention, October means Horror movies and even though that is not exactly my forte, like last year, I wanted to take this opportunity to strike out some names off my watch-list. Below are mini reviews of some of the horror films I saw this month. I guess I will watch few more in the 10 days to come including my Blind Spot this month but it seems like you will have to read about them in the monthly wrap up post. Let’s get to it then!

The Changeling(1980): George C. Scott is one of those people who have impressed me in every single role I have seen him in. Arguably, I have only seen his legendary stuff in pre-Patton(1970) era but with that he has become a name that I am instantly drawn to regardless of much else in the movie. I would have easily been satisfied by that but that’s not the only pedigree this movie came with. It also came highly recommended as one of the best Horror movies and I decided to give it a go on the occasion of this month. After losing his daughter and wife in freakish car accident composer John Russell, played by George C. Scott, is slowly returning back to his normal life. He moves to Washington State to teach and rents out an old mansion to find some peace. Soon he experiences some paranormal activities in the house and as he digs deeper, with the help of Claire Norman who helped him finding this house, uncovers a terrible secret guarded heavily for more than half a century by very powerful person.

It certainly did impress me with its traditional horror elements but what elevates its status a bit more in my eyes are the non-Horror aspects of it. As a non-horror fan, I find most of the horror movies fixate on the gory stuff unnecessarily leaving most of the basic film stuff unattended. Story is usually non present or at best can be expressed in couple of lines, characters tend to do inexplicable things that even a 4-year old would not otherwise. Where The Changeling scores is in being a decent film even when it’s not a horror film. In John Russell and Claire Norman trying to find out the reasons for paranormal experiences in his house, it gives us a good background story and takes some time and pain to explore it and moreover to come to an intelligent, satisfying conclusion. It starts off and also ends on traditional horror notes but in between the two, it provides an engaging human story which works almost like a detective work. Even with the horror elements, it mostly stays away from relying on effects and does more with atmosphere which makes them work even after more than 30 years. Decent story, good performances and horror elements that can do their thing even today definitely made it a worthy watch for me this October.
Rating(out of 5):


Suspiria(1977): Now to the elephant in the room, Suspiria, my first ever Argento film. I often try to challenge myself and watch something that I normally wouldn’t. These horror mini marathons in October are part of that exercise as I rarely go out of my way to watch a horror movie for the rest of the year. I look at it as a part of my growth as a film lover. However unfortunately, more often than not it turns into me hating on a classic. I had been meaning to take a look at some of his films almost since last Halloween and off course, what could be better than starting off with one of his most famous films right? Apparently a lot, because I seriously could not get into this film. At All. Sorry everyone but so not my cup of tea. Everyone in the film was weird, creepy and loud. Way too loud. Everything is needlessly spooky, suspicious and most of what happens is without any reasonable justification; a random sequence of events that just happen to involve the same characters. I guess a lot of these things are done purposefully, maybe because of the limitations of the era or to give it more jarring look and feel but either way, it took me out of the film time and again.

Even though I knew Suspiria by reputation it turns out that I really did not know anything about it because I had no idea it had anything to do with ballet school or even Germany. However that does pose a small problem for me because I don’t know if I missed something but it doesn’t really use that setting. For all you know, it could have been set in any girl’s hostel in Africa somewhere and it would still work fine. There are few other details as well that we are privy to but don’t really add anything to the story. Like Olga vanishes completely after her brief spell early or Daniel’s dog randomly starts killing people. Were we suppose to forget that happened and move on? Probably one of the reasons why I don’t like horror movies particularly is because I don’t give them a free pass on everything else as long as they fulfill the scary requirements. I still look into them some kind of sensible story, character development as story progresses and most horror movies fall short on these bars. And most of them don’t really scare me. They make me jump once or twice but nothing further. Suspiria created similar sense of dread with its score, surrounding and bright colored sets but after a while it gets so heavy-handed that I was completely turned off by it. Sorry, I Guess!
Rating(out of 5):
Sunshine(2007): I know this is probably not the most conventional horror film, much more on the lines of a thriller but if we can include TheThing(1982), I think there is no reason why not include this one as well. And for my money, The Thing is one of the best horror films I have seen. Like Ang Lee, Danny Boyle is another director praised for venturing into different genre with his every film. This is him primarily trying his hand in sci-fi. I have kind of love-hate relationship with the director. I don’t have a very high opinion of two of his most revered films, Trainspoting(1996) or Slumdog Millionaire(2008) but 28 Days Later...(2002) and 127 Hours(2010) are saving graces. Considering all this, I wasn’t really enthused about it going in but I have to say that this is my favourite Boyle so far.

Set 50 years into the future, our Sun in beginning to die. A team of 8 astronauts is set on the mission to reignite Sun and save mankind from extinction. Seven years ago, similar team underwent similar mission but they failed. So this is our last hope. On their way to Sun, they pick up signals from previous ship on the mission and decide to take a detour and look for them. As you would expect this is where things start getting south but as I did not expect it to, it kept me on my toes almost throughout its length. Right from the expository voice over narration at the start, it takes a deep, serious tone which slowly becomes menacing by the end. There is a sense of dread, of looming storm from the start which added a lot to it. Though not as drastic a change as 28 Days Later..., in the last 30—40 minutes even Sunshine turns into something else entirely. Parts of it didn’t make much sense to me and can be construed as weak link but it had scored enough brownie points by then and maybe it will make a little more sense on re-watch. Gorgeous shots of Sun, well acted, well written story and ability to keep me engaged till the very end is what makes this my favourite Boyle.
Rating(out of 5):
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...