Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts

Monday, April 15, 2013

Top 5: Films that I changed my opinion on Re-watch


The other day, Alex published another one of his brilliant lists on ’15 Movies that demand repeat viewings’. After going through his list, I started thinking about movies that would make my list if I made such a list. Anyways I did not have anything specific in mind to write and it has been a while since I stole one of his ideas for a post. But when I actually sat myself down, I realised that despite my dubious re-watch history, I have too many options if I decide to include movies that just get better as you watch them again and again. So I decided to use some filter to contain myself and put my own spin on it. What I came up with is movies that I did not necessarily liked, for various reasons, the first time I saw them or maybe even did not understand, as it did happen in few cases below, but went head over heels the next time I sat my butt down to watch them. It’s funny how that happens sometimes. Here are 5 such occasions:

8½(1963): Technically, I am not sure if this counts because my re-watch was on the very next day. Fellini’s masterpiece gave me a headache first time I saw it. I had no idea why was I supposed to be interested in this guy who is clearly not interested in what he is doing. And top of that, he is being a jerk. Add to it that most of what I was watching on-screen didn’t make a lick of sense to me. Where the hell did that dream sequence come from? What’s that supposed to mean? I was almost ready to give up on it but that final scene made some impression on me. If nothing, it made me think and I kept on thinking for a long time. More I thought about it, whole movie started to make more sense to me. Out of nowhere, I was justifying everything that I thought as senseless few minutes ago. I wrestled with myself quite a lot that day with two polar opposite reactions I was having. One telling me it's too pretentious, it is shooting for the stars but ends up in a roadside ditch; other one saying it's beautiful, it's poetic, you just haven't thought enough on it. Only thing I could do to draw some conclusion from this was to watch it again. I did exactly that the very next day and this time, absolutely loved it from very first scene. It was like I am watching a completely different movie from yesterday. Everything was making sense, his action, intentions; I was even reading between the lines. Everything was there for me to see but somehow I had missed it the day before or chose not to see it. If you ask me now, I will say that 8½ is as great as everyone has made you believe.

The Godfather(1972): Before anyone goes on lamenting my inclusion of 1972 classic which is widely regarded as one of the best films made ever, let me make it very clear that it is one of my Top 10 movies of all time. However it wasn’t always the case. First time I saw The Godfather was sometime in 1999-00. We just had a new PC at home and my older brother bought this on CD. When I put this on short while after, I had no idea what it was about. I had no idea who Mario Puzo was, who Marlon Brando was or for that matter, even who Al Pacino was. My cinefile days were nowhere near the horizon then. I had trouble understanding Brando’s dialogue and to be honest, it really bored me. I don’t think I even made through the opening wedding sequence. Fast forward to 4 years later, 2003 Summer when I was waiting for my college to start and spent most of it reading a bunch of books from a library nearby, 50 to be exact. One of them was Mario Puzo’s The Godfather. Off course, I loved it. How can anyone not? But I still had that first impression of movie somewhere in the back of my mind since I took my time to get back to the movie despite loving the book and knowing we have it in our collection. But when I eventually did, I was just taken by it as much as I was by the book. To this day, along with To Kill a Mockingbird(1962) and Lord of the Rings Trilogy, I site it as one of the best adaptations of book and probably always will.

Fargo(1996): Of all the movies on this list, Fargo is the only one that I did see from start and finish for the first time and didn’t like. There are two that I never finished the first time and other two that I did finish, I re-watched them the very next day and this time, loved them. My impression of Fargo did not change until very recently. So in a way, this is the only legitimate entry and all the other four are cheats. Whatever! It really didn’t work for me the first time though. It was supposed to be one of the best movies of that decade or something and I was having a very cold reaction to it which is kind of ironic, given all the snow in it. I remember talking to many of my friends, online as well as in person, who also thought my indifference strange. About six months ago, one weekend, I saw it again on TV just to make sure if I still hold my ground and once more, my reaction surprised me. This time everything worked like a charm. All the “Oh, Yeah”s which quite frankly are just far too many, all the humour and more importantly underlying creepiness of the whole situation. Everything! Margo Gundersan is the Man!! and Roger Deakins. Wow! I often wonder why I did not like it the first time? what changed? In all the other cases here, I have some clear cut reason for this change of heart and only thing I have come up with is probably I saw it very early in my Coen Brother's education to really understand all the dark humour in it. I am pretty sure I did not even know any of William H. Macy, Steve Buscemi or Pater Stormare then. Better late than never, I guess.

The Discreet Charm of Bourgeoisie(1972): Now my story of Discreet Charm is very similar to that of 8½. I had recently seen my first Bunuel, That Obscure Object of Desire(1977) and though I had certain reservations against it, I liked it enough to seek out some other titles Bunuel did. One that came into discussion quite often was The Discreet Charm of Bourgeoisie. I found it in our college library and gave it a go. One thing I didn’t know about the structure of the movie before watching it, was the episodic nature of it. The first time I saw it, this structure turned out to be a big distraction. For those who haven’t seen it, there is one scene of six main characters walking on a street, casually talking to each other that appears again and again(picture above). What happens between them is one story and we have five or six of such stories. We have same six characters in all the stories but all the individual stories aren’t necessarily connected or are in any sequence and watching it without knowing they aren’t gets really frustrating. That’s exactly what happened to me. I spent most of my time trying to connect them, make sense of characters behaving like they have dementia and that one scene again and again didn’t really help either. But then I read somewhere about this and when I saw it again the next day before returning it to the library, it really hit me. Incisive nature with which Bunuel attacks hypocrite nature of various factions of society is at its peak in Viridiana(1961) but Discreet Charm really isn’t that far behind.

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy(2001-03): Yup. Lord of the Rings makes this list. This might come as a shock to many people, especially those who know how passionate I am about them now. Basically, LOTR is the movie I have seen the most; around 20 times and I am not even kidding. On top of that, I never watch one movie; it’s always three movies together and I have never seen theatrical version, it has always been extended version which as a whole clocks at around 11 hours. So if we do the math, I have spent about 9 whole days of my life watching this trilogy. And still the first time I saw it aka only time I saw theatrical version, I didn’t even finish Fellowship; hell, I didn’t even reach Rivendell. It was summer of 2003. I was with some of my friends and we were going to spend a night at Friend's place to leave super early next day for a two day hiking trip. Just like The Godfather, we gave it a go without any of us properly initialized to it, none of us was even particularly interested in it. I remember going as far as Saruman raising his army without any sense of whatever happening on the screen. Then either I dozed off or we turned it off completely and just went to sleep, never to return to it until 2006. 2006 Fall was when I read the book and I still believe that majority of my appreciation for films comes from the immense respect I have for the book. Immediately after, I borrowed extended edition from a friend which if I am not wrong was a pack of 10 CDs. And the love story began…

It really is funny how that happens sometimes, isn't it? How about you? Do you have a movie you hated at first but somehow love it by now? Let me know in the comments.

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Versatile Blogger Award


Over the last year that U, Me and Films has been in the game, various friends have nominated me from various blogging awards. However for certain reason, I have never responded to it before. On the first day of this year, Ruth @"...let's be splendid about this..." nominated me for another award, The Versatile Blogger award. This isn't the first time she has nominated me for such an award, Ruth is one of the oldest followers of this blog and I thought that, now that I have much more settled with this blog, this would be a good opportunity to do one myself. So, I wholeheartedly thank Ruth for considering me worthy of this and the previous awards as well as  all the support and encouragement and give you the rules of the award that Ruth passed on to me.
The rules:
  • Display the award certificate on your website
  • Announce your win with a post and include a link to whoever sent you the award
  • Present fifteen awards to deserving bloggers
  • Create a post linking to them and drop them a comment to tip them off
  • Post seven interesting facts about yourself. 
So, the seven facts. This should be easy, considering I have never done this before. So, most of you do not know much about me. But as it turns out - rule says "Interesting" facts. So, lets see if I can make them interesting.

1. Since I was a kid, I was always good at Mathematics, specifically doing calculations orally. As I grew older, I got better. So much that in College, my friends used to yell random questions at me just to test me out. Off course, I got them all. 

2. I think I have said this before but English is my Third Language. Not first, not second, third but such is the case for most of us, Indians. So, it really isn't a big deal.

3. I am a late bloomer when it comes to being a movie buff. I think I became much more serious after coming to US 3 years ago, even though I did see many English movies before. I was a bookworm long before that.

4. In the Summer of 2003, just before starting my college, I read 50 books in 90 days and quite a few of them were more than 500 pages long. More interesting fact is the reason I remember this is I made a list of all the books I read and since then I have kept it updated.

5. Harry Potter and Philosopher's Stone was the first book I read in English when I was 16 and if my memory serves right, Home Alone(1990) was the first movie I saw in English. I must be 8 or 9 then.

6. Just like I keep the list of books, I also keep the list of movies I have watched but it's online - on IMDb. Over the last three years, I have religiously voted every single movie I have seen. As of today, I have rated 1316 titles on it.

7. Back in India, we own almost 300 movies. You want to guess how many I have here in US? 2. Judgement at Nuremberg(1961) and The Family Stone(2005) which I haven't seen yet. I Know. On the other hand, I have close to 30 books here and almost 100 at home. Not many, I know but if you compare them to the movies, you will see the contrast.

Now we come to the final part - nominating other bloggers. I am going to do two things different though. First, there is no way I am nominating 15 bloggers and secondly, as I said before that there have been more than one occasion where U, Me and Films was nominated before but since this is my first time replying, I am going to nominate those who've given some award to me before, as a vote of thanks to them. In case if I have forgotten someone, because I have a crappy memory like that sometimes, you know who to blame. 

Here are the bloggers -







Thanks Ruth for giving me this chance and thanks to all of you for thinking of me in the past.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Double Review: The Help, Book and Movie



A Week ago, while working at my job at my university library, I saw someone return Katheryn Stockett’s ‘The Help’. I was intrigued by it since the release of movie earlier this year. But I had no idea that it was available in my library. So, I took this opportunity with both hands. And in last week I read the book and immediately followed it by the movie to pitch them against each other. In general, most of the movies adapted from the books, I usually end up loving the book and hating the movie – Lord of the Rings Trilogy, The Godfather(1972) and To Kill a Mockingbird(1962) being the only exceptions so far. So usually I would not have done it. But since movie was praised by many people, I decided to take this chance. Since there have been plethora of reviews out there already and most of them do a wonderful job of it, I will not tell you much about it. I will rather concentrate my energy on comparing the two versions.

I am sure that by now everyone knows that The Help(2011) is about a young, 20 something white woman from Jackson, Mississippi in 1960 who writes a book with help of few black maids about how it is to be working for white woman.  Now, first of all, let me say that this movie adaptation of book stays almost true to the book, which is nice to see. There are parts which have been changed in the movie. However, in most cases, they do not affect the final outcome too much. And film still floats. However, still, book remains the better version of the two. And again the reason behind it is the deviations from the original script. Film is written and co-directed by Tate Taylor, childhood Friend of author Katheryn Stockett. Both of them being the product of the very system, it shows that they know what they are talking about. In the end of the book, author says that 'In The Help(2011) there is one line that I truly prize: Wasn't that the point of the book? For women to realise, We are just two people. Not much that separates us. Not nearly as much as I'd thought'. And they both emphasize it quite clearly.
Book works much more on personal level. It introduces all those characters to us, takes us into their lives. We live with them through their good days and bad. Making all these characters Gray, rather than plain Black and White, it almost makes us believe that they as human as you and me. In movie, we love and hate them as well. But you do not love AND hate anyone in movie. After book, I did love and Hate Celia Foote and even Hilly. There are few things explained in the book (e,g Hilly - even though she is a devil of a woman, she does stand behind skeeter, fixing her with Stuart and incident with Celia protecting Minny from an attacker) that even though do not affect the overall flow of the story, give the concerned characters much more depth helping humanize them.

One more thing that movie does is it changes the chronology of some of the events. But, to be honest, I did not have a problem with it. I rather liked the idea of starting with Aibileen dictating to Skeeter. It also gets rid of some parts. Skeeter's story with Stuart has lot of twists and turns in book. But again, even though it does give a much more emotional depth to the skeeter's character, I was OK with ditching the whole thing. However, the problem is with the parts which are included in the movie but they are changed e.g Constantine's story or rather Rachel's (Lulabelle in the book) story is much more convincing, dramatic even. Also, Skeeter finds out really late that her mother has Cancer in the book. Part where she figures that out, patches up with Stuart and breaks up again and finds out the truth about Constantine is really heart-breaking. Also, skeeter's mother never figures out that Anonymous is her daughter. Also, all the other maids do not know about Minny's involvement in the project until Yule May episode, which gives her the credit to bring others in.
Now, for the movie. Even though it does change a little here and there, overall it stays true to the emotion till the end. This and plethora of wonderful performances in the movie make it worth watching. Viola Davis and Octavia Spencer as Aibileen and Minny respectively are wonderful. I surely can understand the Oscar Buzz around Viola Davis and hope she does get it. Emma Stone is also wonderful though I would have loved to see her character develop a little more. However, for me Jessica Chastain and Bryce Dallas Howard take the cake. Hilly is mean, despicable, controlling and embodied to the perfection by Bryce Dallas Howard. Jessica Chastain, Star of the Year, is revelation as frivolous housewife, excluded by all the 'Society Ladies' because she is White Trash. I wouldn't be surprised if either of them lands with the nomination as well. And the ending is little idealistic where in book, it keeps it much more realistic. My only problem with the book remains to be that it looks like scraps of the top of everything. Like Book does, it does not reach to the heart of the situation, and that is what keeps it from being Great.


Rating(out of 5):

           The Help(Book)                                                                                                   The Help(Movie)
 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...